Genchi vs Jellyfish
Jellyfish calls itself an engineering management platform: it analyzes data from Jira, Git and other engineering tools, alongside calendar, finance and HR data, to show leaders where engineering time and money go and how work lines up with business goals. Genchi gives engineering leaders a project delivery prediction from the people doing the work: an anonymous, 1-click confidence vote from everyone on the project, combined by project and tracked over time. Jellyfish tells you where engineering effort went. Genchi tells you whether each project is expected to land on time.
What Jellyfish does well
- Resource allocation. It shows how engineering capacity splits across initiatives, new work and maintenance.
- Business alignment. It maps engineering work to strategic objectives for finance, executive and board reporting.
- R&D cost reporting, suitable for capitalization.
- Delivery tracking, from the data your tools already hold.
Where it differs
- Analytics from engineering data vs a prediction from the people doing the work. Jellyfish builds its picture from what your tools recorded. Genchi asks everyone working on a project, independently and anonymously, whether it will achieve its goal by the deadline, and combines their answers into a project delivery prediction. People usually know about a slipping dependency or a hidden problem before it shows up in the data. Does asking the team actually work? →
- Where effort went vs whether the date holds. Jellyfish answers investment questions: how much time went to which initiative, and what it cost. Genchi answers one delivery question for every project, and shows which teams to leave alone.
- An enterprise platform vs one signal. Jellyfish is a broad platform for engineering, finance and executive reporting. Genchi has no Git, CI or ticket telemetry and does one job.
- Setup. Jellyfish is sold through sales and connected across your toolchain. Genchi is self-serve: set up a project, invite the team, and the first confidence vote goes out tomorrow.
What it costs
Jellyfish doesn't publish its prices; it's quote-based. Genchi is free for teams of up to 10, then $2.50 per user per month, billed in blocks of 10: about $250 a month for 100 people.
Side by side
| Jellyfish | Genchi | |
|---|---|---|
| Question it answers | Where is engineering time and money going? | Will we achieve the goal by the deadline? |
| Source of the signal | Engineering tools, plus calendar, finance and HR data | Everyone working on the project |
| Effort per person | None; data is collected automatically | One click, about two seconds |
| Output | Allocation, investment and delivery dashboards | Score, trend and individual votes, across a color-coded portfolio |
| Setup | Sales-led, connected across the toolchain | Self-serve; first vote goes out tomorrow |
| Price | Not published; quote-based | Free up to 10; $2.50 per user per month |
Use both
Jellyfish shows where the effort went, and Genchi shows whether the people doing the work believe it will land on time. Allocation data can look healthy on a project the team already doubts.
Genchi is our product. Jellyfish is a leading engineering management platform, and the two do different jobs.
Ask the people who know what the data can't see
Set up a project, invite the team, and your first confidence vote goes out tomorrow.
START FREE TRIAL2-week free trial. Teams of up to 10 stay free; larger teams pay $2.50/user/month for every billed user (~$250/month for a 100-person org). No credit card to start.