Genchi vs manual status reports and spreadsheets

A manual status report tells you what one person believed, and was willing to write down, at the moment they wrote it. Genchi gives you a project delivery prediction from everyone doing the work, refreshed on a regular cadence, at the cost of one click each. Most organizations still need a short narrative update for stakeholders. Genchi answers the question underneath it: is this project on track?

Why manual reports are everywhere

Project status doesn't live in one place. It's spread across Jira, Asana, Slack threads, email and hallway conversations, and no single system sees all of it. Automating the report would mean connecting every one of those sources and still missing the conversations nobody wrote down. So a person does it by hand: gathers what they can, applies their judgment and writes it up. It works, sort of, and that's why almost every organization still runs on it.

Genchi doesn't try to pull status information out of every system. The people doing the work already hold the whole picture, including the parts that never reach a tracker. A 1-click confidence vote captures their judgment directly. It's far less effort than writing a report, it provides a consistent signal, and it comes from everyone on the project rather than one author.

What manual reports do well

Where they break

Side by side

Manual status report or spreadsheetGenchi
Question it answersWhat happened, and what the author thinks it meansWill we achieve the goal by the deadline?
Source of the signalOne author, usually accountable for the dateEveryone working on the project
DirectionMostly backward-looking, with a forecast in the author's judgmentForward-looking by design
Effort per personMinutes to hours for the author, and chasing for everyone elseOne click, about two seconds
ConsistencyFormat and judgment vary by author, and by weekThe same question on the same scale, every time
IndependenceInputs gathered and edited by one personEach vote anonymous and cast independently
Unit scoredProject, by the author's status colorProject, from the combined votes
OutputNarrative plus red, amber or greenScore, trend and individual votes, across a color-coded portfolio
Who sees itFlows upLeaders and the team, including teams that depend on the project

Why asking everyone works better than asking one person

Independent judgments from the people closest to the work tend to beat a single forecast, because individual errors cancel out. HP, Siemens and Google all tested asking their own people to predict outcomes, and the crowd beat the official forecasts. Genchi keeps that principle, with independent, anonymous votes combined without an editor, and replaces the machinery with a 1-click confidence vote. Does asking the team actually work? →

When to use which

What Genchi won't do

Genchi is our product. Manual reporting is the most common alternative, and in most organizations it won't disappear entirely. This page is about which job each should do.

Replace the chase with a 1-click confidence vote

Set up a project, invite the team, and your first confidence vote goes out tomorrow.

START FREE TRIAL

2-week free trial. Teams of up to 10 stay free; larger teams pay $2.50/user/month for every billed user (~$250/month for a 100-person org). No credit card to start.